The missing step between opening Groww and starting a SIP
Everyone I interviewed who started a SIP had someone say it was fine. This puts that go-ahead inside Groww.
Type
Feature addition
Goal
More first-time SIPs
AARRR stage: Activation
Status
Prototype, user tested
Evidence
12 of 15 interviews
needed assurance before starting.
The Problem
For a first-timer, Start a SIP is a list, standing in for a decision. I believed the freeze was choice overload. Nobody froze for lack of options. They froze waiting for a person to say it was okay.
Start a SIP, today
For a first-timer, it is an unanswered question wearing logos.
Believed
Too many funds. Choice overload.
Found
Nobody froze for lack of options. They froze waiting for a person to say it was okay.
How might we
Give a first-time investor the go-ahead a brother would give — where to start and how much — without naming a fund.
What Each Side Needed
People
A normal place to start
To know what a normal, sensible starting point looks like, and feel confident it isn't a mistake.
A number from someone trusted
Someone they trust to give a specific number, so they don't have to work it out from scratch.
Not locked in
To know they can pause or stop if they need the money, so they don't feel financially trapped.
Groww
More first-time SIPs
The goal sits at Activation: more people starting their first SIP.
The quick path stays
The existing fund list stays on the same screen, below the guide.
The Evidence
The evidence, and where it's thin.
From the interviews
15Interviews
12/15Interviews
People said they needed assurance before starting
The same showed up on Reddit, Quora and YouTube.
3/15Interviews
Were unsure how much to put in
So the plan opens with one monthly amount.
Where it's thin. 12 of the 15 had already activated, so my first-timer persona leans on Reddit, Quora and YouTube.
The Solution
Two screens. A guide on Start a SIP, then an investment plan, before the fund and the SIP amount.
ExploreStart a SIP · guide + listInvestment planFundSIP amountDone
Screen 1: A sentence that fills itself in
Live prototype · loops
Name a goal, a year and a target. Never the monthly amount.Cost. Four forced answers, no skip. The guide is a commitment, not a suggestion.
Screen 2: A group, not a name
The number first, then a group of two funds. Never one pick.Cost. Not naming one fund hands the last pick back. That's the freeze I set out to fix, one screen later.
Fast: three answers on one card, then a starting zone. But preset chips forced a rounded goal (₹1.5 lakh had to become "1 lakh" or "5 lakh"), and a card of options still reads like a form to complete, not a go-ahead from someone.
Two amounts before the first fund
And a paragraph
Hi-fi result: a start and a full pace
Gentle and honest: a ₹2,000 start, with the ₹4,000 full pace beside it. But two amounts and a paragraph came before the first fund, so the ₹2,000 felt like a teaser and the ₹4,000 like the real price.
My Learnings
From user testing
Most testers agreed: with assurance like this, they would invest more.